Maya
Writing

La Corona Hieroglyphic Panel
Modern scholars agree that
the Mayan glyphs are one of only three writing systems in the
ancient world -- the other
two being Sumerian cuneiform in ancient
Mesopotamia and Chinese --
to be invented independently.
All others were probably modeled after or influenced by existing
scripts. Mayan was the last of the three scripts to be deciphered,
beginning in the 1950s. A few scholars contend that the
Olmec, living along the Gulf of Mejico near
Veracruz,
developed a script even
earlier. Some of the confusion stems from
differing definitions of writing, whether a few symbols strung
together suffice or fuller texts are required. Archaeologists
reported on Jan 2006, that the script sample, discovered at
San Bartolo,
in northeastern
Petén,
Guatemala, is
clear evidence that the Maya were writing more than 2,300 years ago.
This is a few centuries earlier than previous well-dated Maya
writing and 600 years before the civilization's classic period, when
a decipherable writing system became widespread. ''This early Maya
writing,, implies that a developed Maya writing system was in use
centuries earlier than previously thought, approximating a time when
we see the earliest scripts elsewhere in Mesoamerica.''
For a Mesoweb Dictionary of Classic Maya go to:
http://www.mesoweb.com/resources/vocabulary/Vocabulary.pdf
The Mayans evolved the only true
written system native to the Americas, Although Only
4 Codices
survive today
(See the end
of this page),
(Alonso
de Zorita wrote that in 1540 he saw numerous such books in the
Guatemalan highlands which “recorded their history for more than
eight hundred years back, and which were interpreted for me by very
ancient Indians” (Zorita 1963, 271-2). Fr. Bartolomé de las Casas
lamented that when found, such books were destroyed: "These books
were seen by our clergy, and even I saw part of those which were
burned by the monks, apparently because they thought [they] might
harm the Indians in matters concerning religion, since at that time
they were at the beginning of their conversion"),
.they left us
their Art and script in Stelas, Wooden lintels, Murals, Petro-carvings and ceramics to
read about their
warfare, lives,
believes and culture.
There also very early texts found in
the Pacific
lowlands
in
Cotzumalguapa,
Tak'alik Abaj,
and in the
Highlands at El Portón,
Kaminal Juyú
(Stela 10
glyph bloc, Letft),
and the Petén Lowland Mayan scripts.
The origin of the Maya script has been focus of attention by many
scholars, and they Think that all the Mayan languages as well as the Olmec had the same roots.
(Coe 1957, 1976; Prem 1971; Marcus 1976, 1992; Justeson et al. 1985;
Justeson and Mathews 1990; Taube 2000).
The Stela 10, in Kaminal Juyú
(late Verbena phase, 400-200 B.C., late Preclassic), has
the earliest glyphs in
Cho´lan Maya, the language used in the
Classic Lowlands sites,
suggesting that the origin of this language was in the
Highlands,
and that the relationships between the
Petén and the
Highlands, was closer than previously thought
|

Variation in Glyphs, The Founder of
Naranjo,
Yax Wak-kab-nal Winik,
Altar 1, and Stela 24 |
|

Stela 13 and a Ceramic Vase |
The Maya writing
system (often called hieroglyphics from a vague superficial resemblance
to the Egyptian writing, to which it is not related) was a combination of phonetic symbols and ideograms. It is the only writing system of the
Pre-Columbian New World that can completely represent spoken language to
the same degree as the written language of the old world. Early sites
such as Tak'alik Abaj in the
Pacific Lowlands
has inscriptions
with the early Maya style. The
San
Bartolo Murals have 10 Glyph that can not be read and are the
oldest known, dating to 300 BC. "The text is 1,000 years before the
late Classic writing, which we are good at reading up to 95
percent of it," Dr. Stuart said. "Any script is going to go through
significant changes over that time. But these glyphs are very
unusual, very different from later writing."
The single glyph he thought he could read was the seventh one down
the column. It includes the sign for the word lord or noble. "But if
it referred to a true king," Dr. Stuart said, "the sign would have a
symbol with it to say divine lord.'". This inability to read
the text, Dr. Houston said, may be because the Maya system underwent
a major change at the time the
Preclassic culture collapsed, around
A.D. 100 to 200, with widespread evidence of destroyed or abandoned
cities. Archaeologists expressed hope that more of the text or
similar ones would eventually be found and that new efforts would be
made to search for writing at larger Preclassic sites, like
El Mirador
(Stela 2).

Maya scribe kneeled after Ruler. Note the
ink
pots. and Maiden with
Chocolate jar.
Petén Middle Classic
The
decipherment of the Classic Maya writings has been a long laborious process.
Bits of it were first deciphered in the late 19th and early 20th century
(mostly the parts having to do with numbers, the calendar, and astronomy),
but major breakthroughs came starting in the 1960s and 1970s and
accelerated rapidly

thereafter, so that now the majority of Maya texts
can be read nearly completely in their original languages. Recently it
was suggested that Classic texts were written not in Ch'olan Mayan, as long assumed, but in a "prestige" or "high"
language called
Classic Ch'olti'an, related to the now extinct
Ch'olti' language of the
Eastern Ch'olan Maya language family
(Houston, Robertson, and Stuart 2000). This language, is thought to
have originated in western
and
south-central
Petén, and would have
been used in the inscriptions and perhaps also spoken by elites and
priests (Houston 2000:162).
With the
decipherment of the Maya script it was discovered that the Maya were one
of the few civilizations where artists attached their name to their
work. The calligraphic style and pictorial complexity of Maya glyphs are
like no other writing system. While the decipherment of Maya
hieroglyphs has been advancing rapidly in the past few decades,
differing opinions of whether or not Maya writing was either a number of
simple word-pictures or a sophisticated phonetic system stifled
decipherment for years. Indeed, it was only in the mid-twentieth century
following a breakthrough by
Mayanist Tatiana
Proskouriakoff,
(right) studying
the Piedras Negras Stela 14 in Petén (down left), She suggested that
these "niche" scenes represented rulers newly seated on their
thrones.
 |
 |
|
Antwerp
Stela (Belgium)
Petén Lowlands 200 BC, Showing Glyphs, The Face is almost
Identical to one in San Bartolo Murals |
She pointed out that the "niche" Stela always
carried the earliest dates of their series and that a certain set of
"inaugural" hieroglyphs followed those dates whenever they
appeared in later texts. This breakthrough led to the recognition of
birth and death glyphs, the
name-glyphs
of the rulers, parentage information, the capture of enemies, and
other biographical items from the lives of the Maya rulers. Since
then, epigraphers (or glyphic experts) could finally agree that Maya
Hieroglyphic Writing was a fully functional system based on phonetic
signs. In 1958 by Heinrich Berlin, discovered the "Emblem
glyph."
After surveying a wide range of Maya inscriptions, Berlin noticed
the presence of a specialized type of hieroglyph that always
consisted of a standard set of
affixes combined with variable main signs. Each main sign had a
limited distribution, occurring, with a few exceptions, at one site
and no other. Today it is recognized as the Lineage of the Rulers.
|
 |
|
Landa's
Maya Alphabet (Click to enlarge) |
Landa's Mayan
alphabet:
While our system is also based on
phonetic signs, in comparison to Maya writing our system seems much
simpler. All of our words are formed from various combinations of only
26 signs, that list of letters we call an Alphabet. By contrast, all Maya
words are formed from various combinations of nearly 800 signs, and each
sign represents a full syllable, so that list of signs is called a
Syllabary, not an Alphabet.
Twenty-six signs versus hundreds of signs?, Sounds
impossible?, Not really,
while one sign of our alphabet can represent only one sound, Maya
writers could select from many different signs to represent one
sound.
For example, there are at least five different signs that could be
chosen to represent the Maya syllable
ba.
In the syllabary, sounds
are formed by combining a particular consonant with one of the five
vowels; a, e, i, o, or, u. If a Maya writer wanted to describe the act
of "writing" (or tz’ib’
in Maya) the scribe ( ah tz’ib’
or
"he
who writes"), could select from
several different signs to convey the sounds. For example, this
combination might be chosen:
Structure There are only about 30
phonetic sounds in the Maya
language so a purely phonetic alphabet could in theory be written with
30 signs. It was originally thought that Maya writing was purely
logographic because of the many hundreds of different glyphs. After a
long period of attempts to decipher the Maya glyphs, it was discovered
that the system was logosyllabic and became increasingly phonetic over
time. Maya writing uses a syllabary made up of glyphs rather than a pure
alphabet and is a mixed system. Many of the glyphs are polyvalent and
have two or more meanings. Glyphs have been identified that correspond
to verbs, nouns, adjectives, and particles. Maya writing is structured
around
glyphs and glyph groups. The glyphs are pictures.
Main signs
u multunob
are larger and more central in a group.
Affixes
u ceilob
are joined to the main sign and may be
prefixes
u sak ceilob,
(left),
superfixes
u kaan ceilob, (above),
subfixes
u ek ceilob, (below),
and
postfixes
u kan ceilob
(right) depending upon their position.
Affixes can also be fused within the main glyph and are called
infixes. Main signs can be compounded of two or more signs.
Although there are exceptions the usual order of reading the glyphs is
prefix, superfix, main sign, subfix, and postfix.
Note that the last Vowel is not pronounced The Cacao example will
illustrate this:

Cacao Glyph
There are about 800 glyphs that are known at
this time and each has a catalogue number starting with
"T"
(in J. Eric Thompson’s system), and many have nicknames. If there
are only two columns of glyphs, text is normally read from left to
right. For even numbers of columns the first two columns are read
left to right and the next two columns are read left to right, etc.
For odd numbers of columns the order is down the first column and
then left to right for the next two columns or left to right for the
first two columns and then down the rightmost column. In the Paris
Codex where recognizable faces appear the reading order on a few
pages is right to left. Maya codices are often ordered
verb-object-subject as in the language. Like English the final
syllable may be silent.

Sea Shell used as Ink Pot, the Glyph is read as: ku'ch sab'ak,
meaning "It
is an ink-carrier
"
There are other elements of the Maya's syntaxis that must be
necessarily comprehended in order to be able to correctly interpret
the movement and concept of time in the Maya's writings. These are
named
Hel Glyphs, which are accompanied by corresponding distance
numbers. A Hel Glyph projects onto historical events whether they be
in the past or in the future, these require the reader to read a
short independent clause, which refers to ascensions, relating the
central character to a family line, but usually referring to a
specific time frame within the text. The central character, telling
the story, may use a Hel Glyph, and say "In the year 3,114 B.C. my
forefathers were present, during the Creation of the World," such as
Lord Kan Boar
says in legitimating his lineage on Stela 10 in
Tikal.

Early Classic
Petén,
Jade Statuette*(32
cm ) |

Text Glyphs, with PSS |
Text Interpretation:
' The soul
(Way) of Ab’ B’ahlam.will rise. It is the
carrying-stone of the ?bat head? of Lady. ?[TREE.IN.HAND-BIRD]?
|
In
Ceremonial
pottery, or objects such as
Jade earrings or bone art, The
Primary Standard
Sequence or PSS
is a string of about 35 glyphic signs--in effect a formula--laid out
in an invariable sequence. This originated in the Late
Preclassic period and was standardized in its graphic format by the
middle Early Classic period. No one ceramic text contains them all:
there may be as few as 3 or 4 PSS glyphs on a vessel, or as many as
22, but they are always in the same order. The epigraphers
have concluded that the PSS is one more case of name-tagging, and
demonstrated that ownership statements were an intrinsic part of
inscriptions on portable objects, in this case for the object itself, with the owner or patron being
named, along with his or her titles, at the end of the PSS string.
(Coe 60). Stuart (1989) suggested the most basic PSS is made
up of a possessed
noun (the object’s name) followed by a possessor (the object’s
owner), and optionally a verb which may precede the possessed noun.
MacLeod (1990) agreed with this basic structure and proposed an
additional sentence type not considered by Stuart (1989), consisting
of a glyph called the Initial Sign followed by the sequence glyphs
Codices

Dresden Codice page
The Maya culture in and around what is now the
Petén, Guatemala, produced
codices, around the same time that the Romans did. The factors
leading to the development of the codex in European culture have
been well documented, and the close identity between the Roman and
Maya solutions to the problems of
codex
design, manufacture, purpose, and usage suggests that the codex form
of the transmission of information is not merely an accident of
geography or history. The
Maya developed paper
quite early in the millennium, archaeological evidence of
manufacture and use of bark paper by Maya dates from the early 5th
century AD .
The Maya named their paper Huun,
and saw it as a writing surface when they appropriated their
bark-cloth tunics as a possible means of transmitting information:
“early in their history the Mayas produced a kind of tapa cloth from
the inner bark of certain trees, the main being the wild fig tree *Ficus
guatemalana* or Amate,
named Kopo'
by the Maya, (Left),
and the "Killer tree" another Ficus, for the
Ah T'z'íb'ob
to write in them. Bark-cloth manufacture apparently evolved into
papermaking, although when this occurred is not known”. This
paper, superior in texture, durability, and plasticity to Egyptian
papyrus, was thus perfected anonymously and communally by the Maya.
(Sandstrom and Sandstrom, Traditional Papermaking 13). The Maya
developed paper screen-fold codices as a direct step beyond carving
information into stone buildings and stelas, unlike Western
papermaking, which took a more circuitous route to reach its final
form (single sheets, papyrus rolls, and then leafed codices).
During the 1940s, two scholars, Victor von Hagen and Hans Lenz,
conducted independently of each other ethnological and
anthropological studies into the modern-day descendants of the Maya,
many of whom at that time still spoke
Ki´che´ in Quiché,
Guatemala,
a descended from the Maya language. Both von Hagen and Lenz
were able to observe the Indians making handmade
huun
paper.
From the accounts given by these two scholars, we get a
description of the nature and function of paper up to the arrival of
the Spanish. Von Hagen links the development of paper among the Maya
to similar development around the world at nearly the same time. The
Maya accumulated books, as man had done elsewhere--in China, in
Egypt, in Rome, in Greece. These books, and there were actually
books, were housed and protected down through the centuries. (von
Hagen, “Paper and Civilization” 302)
The contents of
the codices (singular: Codex) must have varied, but some of them were
evidently similar to astronomic almanacs. We have examples of a Venus
table, eclipse tables in a codex in Dresden. The Dresden is now 20.5 cm.
(86 in.) high and 3.56 m. (3 ft. 8.4 in.) long; since both sides of
each leaf had been prepared, the scribe, or scribal team, was faced
with 74 pages totaling at least 2,268 inches of unpainted, white
surface, 8 different authors can be identified due to the distinct
calligraphic and drawing styles.
The only exact Replica, even made from Amate bark paper, and using
the same colors that the Maya (Charcoal Black, Iron oxide Red and
Blue Maya) is displayed in the National Museum of Archaeology of
Guatemala, since October 22, 2007. (A Donation from the Dresden
Museum).
There is a codex in Paris
that seems to contain some kind of
Maya Zodiac, but if it is and how it
must have worked is still unknown.
Another major example of Maya almanacs is present in the
Madrid Códice,
it measures 23 cm. (9.6 in.) high, it measures no less than
6.82 m. (22 ft. 6 in.) in length, offering its scribe 112 pages
covering slightly under 5,000 inches of available surface, this
códice come from Tayasal.
It has not only
Calendrical and
astronomic charts, but also has
several pages dedicated to the daily life, use of
medicinal plants,
art and is
considered a text on Apiculture.
The fourth codex is called the
Grolier
and was authenticated as late as 1983. These codices probably
contained much of the information used by priests or the noble class
to determine dates of importance or seasonal interest. We can only
speculate as to whether or not the Maya developed poetry or drama
that was committed to paper. The codices probably kept track of
dynastic information as well. Dresden Codex probably most
closely resembles the books of the Classic period; its pages are
only 9 cm. wide, in contrast to the 12.2 cm. of the Madrid, and the
12.5 cm of the Paris and Grolier. The small, calligraphically
elegant writing of the Dresden is in perfect harmony with the
comparatively small size of its pages. (Coe 171).
Mayans had a
voluminous literature, covering the whole range of native interests
either written, in their own peculiar "calculiform" hieroglyphic
characters, in books of Amate paper or parchment which were bound in
word, or carved upon the walls of their public buildings. The
oldest Maya codices known have been found by archaeologists as
mortuary offerings with burials in excavations in
Uaxactún,
Guaytán,
and
Nebaj in Guatemala, at Altun Ha in Belize and at Copán in
Honduras. The six examples of Maya books discovered in excavations
date to the Early Classic (Uaxactún
and
Altun Ha), Late Classic
(Nebaj, Copán), and Early Postclassic (Guaytán) periods and,
unfortunately, all have been changed by the pressure and humidity in
the ground during their many years in the ground, eliminating the
organic backing and reducing all into inoperable masses or
collections of very small flakes and bits of the original lime
sizing and multicolor painting. The result being, unfortunately,
more old books which will probably never be read. (Whiting 207-208)
Unfortunately
zealous Spanish priests shortly after the conquest ordered the burning
of all the Maya books, and then also destroyed numerous books at
Tayasal
the Capitol of the Itzáes, (in the modern City of Flores, Petén) that
was conquered in 1697. While many stone inscriptions survive, mostly
from cities already abandoned when the Spanish arrived; only 3
books and a few pages of a fourth from the ancient libraries remain today:
|
The Grolier Codex
 |
The
Paris Codex
|
|
The Dresden Codex
|
|
The
Madrid Codex |
|
|
 |
Download
Codex at:
http://www.schulphysik.de/maya.html
http://www.digital.library.northwestern.edu/codex/infosubmit.html
http://www.mayavase.com/grol/grolier.html
http://www.famsi.org/mayawriting/codices/dresden.html
For more information,
Syllabary and complete
dictionaries of Maya Glyphs go to:
http://www.famsi.org/mayawriting/dictionary/montgomery/index.html
A beautiful done Hieroglyphic Explanation Text can be downloaded at:
http://www.mesoweb.com/resources/handbook/WH2004.pdf
|